Dark Souls 2: The Throne of Want and the Cycle Nobody Breaks

Dark Souls 2’s ending — sitting on the Throne of Want and linking the fire — mirrors the first game’s ending but inverts its framing. In Dark Souls 1, linking the fire is presented as a heroic sacrifice that may or may not be the right choice. In Dark Souls 2, the game has spent seventy hours showing you that the cycle is meaningless, and sitting on the throne anyway is the game’s commentary on player compulsion.

Scholar of the First Sin adds a layer: Aldia, Scholar of the First Sin, appears after the final boss and offers a third option — refuse the throne entirely, neither linking the fire nor letting it die, and simply walk away. Aldia’s dialogue describes this as the only choice that isn’t predetermined: to wander without purpose, without the cycle, without an ending.

The ‘true’ ending of Dark Souls 2 is to refuse the game’s binary and leave. Most players, conditioned by game design conventions, link the fire or let it die. The genuinely subversive choice is to not take a throne that was never yours.

FromSoftware made the non-ending ending require a DLC expansion to access, which means most base-game players never encountered the option.

2 thoughts on “Dark Souls 2: The Throne of Want and the Cycle Nobody Breaks”

  1. SecretLevelSeeker

    Found this by accident on my third run. Came here to understand what I was actually looking at. Great write-up.

  2. ArchivistGamer

    Saved this article for my gaming reference folder. Essential reading for anyone serious about this game.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top